Stunning Photos Surface Refuting Newsom’s ‘Everyman’ Claims
Photos of a young Gavin Newsom have surfaced online that refute a claim he made during a book tour stop in Georgia earlier this week, during which he also remarked a mostly black audience that many viewed as highly racist.
When sharing a stage with Atlanta Mayor Andre Dickens, Newsom said, “I’m not trying to impress you. I’m just trying to impress upon you, ‘I’m like you.’ I’m no better than you. I’m a 960 SAT guy.” But photos that have since surfaced on social media indicate that Newsom’s family was extremely privileged, well-to-do, and highly connected to people like the oil magnate Getty family.
Meanwhile, Newsom is also facing backlash after remarks he made about his SAT score.
Speaking Sunday night at an event promoting his forthcoming memoir, “Young Man in a Hurry,” Newsom reflected on his academic struggles and sought to draw a point of relatability.
In addition to his remark about his SAT score, Newsom added: “And I’m not trying to offend anyone. I’m not trying to act all there if you got 940 … You’ve never seen me read a speech because I cannot read a speech.”
The remarks quickly sparked criticism online, with detractors arguing that Newsom’s attempt at self-deprecation veered into offensive territory.
Warning: Strong language:
Several prominent Republicans and commentators accused Newsom of perpetuating stereotypes.
Sen. Ted Cruz wrote that Newsom was engaging in “the soft bigotry of low expectations,” reposting a message from political scientist Carol M. Swain that read, “Liberal racism on display.”
Sen. Tim Scott criticized the governor on X, writing, “Black Americans aren’t your low bar. We’ve built empires, created movements, outworked, outhustled and outsmarted people like you.”
Rep. Randy Fine (R-Fla.) also weighed in, claiming Newsom had implied he was “like a black person because he got a bad SAT score and can’t read.”
Music artist Nicki Minaj criticized the governor as well, writing that his “way of bonding with black ppl is to tell them how stupid he is & that he can’t read.”
As President Donald Trump put a snarky post on Truth Social, “Wow! Gavin Newscum just dropped out of the Presidential Race!!!”
The criticism spread rapidly across social media, with conservative commentators mocking the remarks and questioning Newsom’s political judgment as he is widely viewed as a potential 2028 Democratic presidential contender.
According to 2024 data from the College Board, the average SAT score for Black or African American test takers — who make up roughly 12% of participants — is 907 out of 1600. White test takers averaged 1083.
Newsom, 58, is a 1989 graduate of Santa Clara University. He has written in his memoir that he struggled academically and has spoken openly about dyslexia. He previously told The New York Times that he believes he was admitted to Santa Clara in part due to a partial baseball scholarship, downplaying the significance of a recommendation letter from former California Gov. Jerry Brown, who had appointed Newsom’s father to a state appellate judgeship.
“I don’t think it’s relevant at all,” Newsom said earlier this month regarding the Brown letter. “The ticket to Santa Clara came through the baseball, not anything else.”
After Fox News host Sean Hannity highlighted the controversy, Newsom fired back on X, referencing his dyslexia and accusing critics of selective outrage.
“You didn’t give a s— about the President of the United States of America posting an ape video of President Obama or calling African nations s—holes — but you’re going to call me racist for talking about my lifelong struggle with dyslexia?” Newsom wrote. “Spare me your fake f—ing outrage, Sean.”
The episode adds to mounting scrutiny of the governor’s national profile as he continues to make appearances outside California and promote his book ahead of what many expect to be a larger role in Democratic politics.
SENATOR KENNEDY DELIVERS FATAL BLOW TO OMAR'S CAREER AS SHE BLAMES TRUMP FOR SOMALI PANIC
Minneapolis, Minn. — Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) held an emergency press conference in Minneapolis to address what she described as widespread fear within the local Somali community amid reports of intensified federal deportation operations under the Trump administration.
Omar stated that the community was “paralyzed by fear,” with families taking precautions such as mothers avoiding phone calls and fathers sleeping in shifts to guard against potential enforcement actions. She attributed the heightened anxiety and an reported increase in death threats against her and her constituents directly to President Donald Trump, accusing his policies and rhetoric of targeting the community and amounting to “ethnic cleansing disguised as policy.”
Omar characterized the situation as the result of a “white nationalist agenda,” positioning herself as a defender of vulnerable families and calling for national attention to what she termed a humanitarian crisis on American soil.
In response, Senator John Kennedy (R-La.) addressed the matter on the Senate floor shortly after Omar’s remarks. Kennedy acknowledged the reported threats and community anxiety but offered a sharply different interpretation of their cause.
“The Congresswoman is very upset today,” Kennedy said. “She says she is receiving threats. She says her community is afraid. And she blames President Trump for lighting the match.”
He continued by arguing that the fear stemmed not from the president’s actions but from the consequences of Omar’s own past statements about the United States. Kennedy stated that Omar had spent years portraying America as a “hateful, racist, evil place” while benefiting from its opportunities, and that the current backlash represented “the receipts for the division you ordered.”
Kennedy concluded that the situation in Minnesota was not a tragedy caused by external forces but “poetic justice,” adding, “The fear in Minnesota isn’t because Donald Trump is a monster. It’s because for the first time in your career, the law has finally arrived to collect the debt you owe.”
The exchange has drawn significant attention on social media and in political commentary circles. Supporters of Omar have echoed her concerns about community safety and the tone of immigration enforcement, while critics have praised Kennedy’s remarks for reframing the narrative around personal accountability and the long-term effects of political rhetoric.
No official confirmation of specific deportation targets in Minneapolis has been released by the Department of Homeland Security at this time, though administration officials have previously indicated that operations would focus on individuals with criminal records or final removal orders. The incident occurs against the backdrop of ongoing national debates over immigration policy, sanctuary jurisdictions, and the balance between enforcement and community relations.
As the 2026 midterm elections approach, the public confrontation between the Minnesota congresswoman and the Louisiana senator has intensified partisan divisions and highlighted contrasting views on the roots of fear and division within immigrant communities.
BREAKING: Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas Makes Announcement No One Saw Coming
WASHINGTON, D.C. — June 2, 2026 — A explosive constitutional crisis has erupted on the nation’s highest bench, exposing a terrifying vulnerability on America's interstate highways and drawing a violent line between state sovereignty and federal enforcement.
What happens when sanctuary-state policies weaponize commercial driving licenses, placing undocumented individuals behind the wheels of 80,000-pound death machines? For a furious faction on the Supreme Court, the answer is a total betrayal of public safety. In a dramatic developments on Monday, Justice Clarence Thomas, joined in full by Justice Samuel Alito, issued a blistering, high-threshold dissent after the Supreme Court flatly refused to hear Florida’s blockbuster lawsuit challenging California and Washington for systematically issuing commercial driver’s licenses (CDLs) to undocumented immigrants in flagrant violation of federal safety standards.
Thomas argued with fierce urgency that the high court had an absolute, unyielding constitutional duty to resolve this escalating interstate warfare, issuing a dark warning that the lax, ideologically driven policies of blue states are actively endangering American roadways and public safety nationwide.
“If this Court does not exercise jurisdiction over a controversy between two States, then the complaining State has no judicial forum in which to seek relief.” — Justice Clarence Thomas
I. THE TURNPIKE MASSACRE: AN 80,000-POUND WEAPON
At the bleeding edge of this legal warfare is a gruesome, real-world tragedy that proves these border disputes are no longer confined to courtrooms.
Thomas used his powerful platform to highlight a deadly 2025 Florida Turnpike crash that shocked the nation. The catastrophic incident involved an undocumented truck driver—licensed exclusively through the lax loopholes of California or Washington—who allegedly executed a fatal, illegal U-turn. Shockingly, investigators revealed the driver could not even read basic American road signs, resulting in a horrific collision that killed three innocent people.
The raw danger of the loophole forced Thomas to issue a chillingly blunt declaration that cut straight through the political noise surrounding the case:
“An illegal alien who cannot read English road signs cannot drive an 80,000-pound tractor-trailer.”
II. THE ADMINISTRATIVE LETHALITY RESPONSE: MARITIME AND HIGHWAY SECURITY
The structural metrics of federal law are completely clear, yet they are being systematically bypassed. Thomas explicitly emphasized that binding federal statutes mandate proper English proficiency, a grueling valid driver’s test, and appropriate, verified immigration status before any individual can legally acquire a commercial license.
This high-stakes case exposes how sanctuary-style policies in liberal states create devastating, border-crossing hazards that spill violently across state lines. This direct defiance collides perfectly with President Donald Trump’s aggressive, heavy-handed immigration enforcement agenda.
Moving at true wartime speed, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy has already stepped into the arena, moving decisively to tighten federal rules for non-citizens seeking CDLs. Duffy has issued a stern, high-threshold warning to California, threatening that the state could lose massive tranches of vital federal funding if it continues its reckless defiance of federal guidelines.
III. THE CONSTITUTIONAL ABDICATION
Thomas made it entirely clear that states surrendered their individual rights to ignore such conflicts the moment they joined the Union. Under the original architecture of the Constitution, the Supreme Court must act as the supreme forum for interstate resolution. By walking away from this fight, Thomas accused the majority of cowardice, prioritizing policy preferences over their sacred constitutional oaths.
“We have no more right to decline the exercise of jurisdiction which is given, than to usurp that which is not given.” — Justice Clarence Thomas
In a telling display of ideological alignment, the Court's liberal justices remained entirely silent during the majority’s refusal to take the case, quietly enabling the dangerous, multi-state commercial licensing practice to continue completely unchecked.
THE FINAL VERDICT
This powerful, historic dissent from Justice Thomas reinforces the absolute baseline of President Trump’s America First priorities: secure borders, unyielding public safety, and total accountability from states that put everyday citizens at risk.
As mass deportation operations rapidly expand across the homeland and federal standards are ruthlessly enforced, Thomas’s call for judicial responsibility highlights an urgent, terrifying truth. The nation must immediately end the reckless policies enabling illegal immigrants to operate heavy commercial vehicles across the American grid. As the high court slams its doors, everyday drivers are left to scan the highway lanes and wonder: who is behind the wheel of the next 18-wheeler approaching them in the dark?
